Re: Constructors motion 30 Version 2: small amendment
John Pryce wrote:
> Also shall num2interval(x) be abolished as Vincent suggests?
> Views please. It can be re-invented at a language level.
We had discussions about this in October 2008 and in February 2010,
with regard to a "Translation Time Datum Type" (TTDT). Although
the proposed C-language extension (ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG14 N1201)
was flawed, the idea behind it was sound. The 2008 subject was
"1e400 and inf", and the 2010 subject was "Constructor Query".
Michel.
---Sent: 2012-02-07 16:49:34 UTC