Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Constructors motion 30 Version 2: small amendment

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Constructors motion 30 Version 2: small amendment
From: Michel Hack <hack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:53:23 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Another relevant reference to "num2interval(x)" came from Sylvain Pion
(Date:  Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:59 +0100  Subject: 1e400 and inf)
> For C++0x, what is planned is "user defined literals".  See the paper here:
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2765.pdf

Michel.
---Sent: 2012-02-07 16:55:56 UTC

Prev by Date: Re: Motion 31: V04.2 Revision of proposed Level 1 text
Next by Date: Re: Constructors motion 30 Version 2: small amendment
Previous by thread: Re: Constructors motion 30 Version 2: small amendment
Next by thread: Re: Constructors motion 30 Version 2: small amendment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread