Re: Motion P1788/M0030.01:Level_1_constructors NO
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 23:15 +0000, Corliss, George wrote:
> 5. Let M0030.01 die for lack of a quorum. As has been pointed out repeatedly, a strategic non-vote is more likely to achieve outcome 5 than a "NO" vote is to achieve outcome 2, given the current vote counts:
> Yes: 14; No: 3; required for quorum: 30-31.
>
The problem with this option is the other rule we have which takes away
the voting right from those who do not vote for two consecutive motions.
I vote NO on motion 30.01 for the reasons mentioned by Vincent.
--
Hossam A. H. Fahmy
Associate Professor
Electronics and Communications Engineering
Cairo University
Egypt