Re: Motion 31
Ulrich et al,
We can take your notational comments into consideration when
writing the actual standards text. Also, it is in general a good
idea to use our agreed upon notation in position papers. However,
I view motion 31, as a position paper, as providing guidance
for actual writing the standards text, so the meaning in motion 31 is
what is of primary importance. That is, even if Motion 31 passes,
we can still use your notation in the text.
Best regards,
Baker
On 04/03/2012 12:01 PM, Ulrich Kulisch wrote:
> Dear P1788 members,
>
> on March 26, 2012 I sent you the attached remarks concerning denotations of motion 31. If the denotations have not been changed since my vote on Mogtion 31 is NO!
>
> Ulrich Kulisch
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------