Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Motion 31



Baker
I would not call the level 1 draft a position paper, but I agree that notation can be changed
Juergen

Am 04.04.2012 05:29, schrieb Ralph Baker Kearfott:
Ulrich et al,

We can take your notational comments into consideration when
writing the actual standards text.  Also, it is in general a good
idea to use our agreed upon notation in position papers.  However,
I view motion 31, as a position paper, as providing guidance
for actual writing the standards text, so the meaning in motion 31 is
what is of primary importance.  That is, even if Motion 31 passes,
we can still use your notation in the text.

Best regards,

Baker

On 04/03/2012 12:01 PM, Ulrich Kulisch wrote:
Dear P1788 members,

on March 26, 2012 I sent you the attached remarks concerning denotations of motion 31. If the denotations have not been changed since my vote on Mogtion 31 is NO!

Ulrich Kulisch




--
o Prof. Dr. Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg, Lehrstuhl fuer Informatik II
    / \          Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg
InfoII o         Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602
  / \  Uni       E-Mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 o   o Wuerzburg