Re: Proposed revision to Level 1 comparisons
Juergen, P-1788,
On 04/09/2012 08:56 AM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
Baker
I suggest to restart the voting on that motion , give John some time to fill in all the tiny improvements and changes in notation.
It is our first vote on the final text so we should not make a formal mistake
George, John, and I had decided off-line to let the vote proceed, to
gather other problems people might find, then to submit all of these either
as amendments (in the case of passage), or as modifications (in the
case of failure). John can make modifications in parallel. Our guess
is that this would reduce the total number of iterations (and time elapsed)
until we get a document with which we all are happy. However, if
you strongly feel this is either improper or not the best way,
we can stop the vote. In the mean time, I request that people
continue to vote.
Best regards,
Baker
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------