Re: Table 4 proposal version 0.2...
On 2012-04-05 13:26:05 -0400, Michel Hack wrote:
> John Pryce wrote:
> > ... P1788's current powr(x,p,q) = x?(p/q).
> > We should rename that. How about "powrat"?
>
> How about "powq"? Sounds a bit more palatable,
> and we do use Q for the Rationals.
Yes, a bit like what is done in GMP and MPFR.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)