| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
On 11 Apr 2012, at 11:33, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-04-05 13:26:05 -0400, Michel Hack wrote: >> John Pryce wrote: >>> ... P1788's current powr(x,p,q) = x?(p/q). >>> We should rename that. How about "powrat"? >> >> How about "powq"? Sounds a bit more palatable, >> and we do use Q for the Rationals. But it now seems best we should drop it from the list. George Corliss & Juergen have spoken against it, and that's OK by me. John Pryce