Re: Do I have a second? Overflow, New Motion
OK, I guess that's reasonable, if that's OK with Nate.
Baker
On 05/02/2012 01:18 PM, Michel Hack wrote:
As Baker's P.S. indicates, there is as yet no actual motion on
the table, so I don't understand what a "second" would be about!
Nate's position paper is well-written btw, and I will post a few
comments soon. But at this point it is just a position paper,
and we don't need a motion to put this into the public list of
position papers. (It may become the Rationale for an upcoming
motion, of course.)
Michel.
---Sent: 2012-05-02 18:23:52 UTC
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------