Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
As Baker's P.S. indicates, there is as yet no actual motion on the table, so I don't understand what a "second" would be about! Nate's position paper is well-written btw, and I will post a few comments soon. But at this point it is just a position paper, and we don't need a motion to put this into the public list of position papers. (It may become the Rationale for an upcoming motion, of course.) Michel. ---Sent: 2012-05-02 18:23:52 UTC