Re: supporting Baker's general approach to the standard
Vladik, Baker, P1788
On 10 May 2012, at 19:04, Kreinovich, Vladik wrote:
> I think Baker has an excellent point. If we follow his idea, we can have a standard fast (or at least on time).
>
> Maybe we should make it an official motion, something like
>
> "Our idea of selecting things to be standardized is to standardize things
> that are already well-understood, and for which there will
> be a universal benefit for everyone to be doing it the
> same way."
>
> as an idea to be included in the preamble of the future standard.
I think that's a good idea.
John Pryce