Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Re: Motion M0033.01 -- Number format: YES
To
: stds-1788 <
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: Motion M0033.01 -- Number format: YES
From
: John Pryce <
j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 05:48:32 +0100
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
201205292006.q4TK6YRZ019638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
References
: <
201205292006.q4TK6YRZ019638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
I vote YES on Vincent's Motion 33. John Pryce
References
:
Motion M0033.01 -- Number format: YES
From:
Michel Hack
Prev by Date:
Motion M0035.01 -- Overflow vs Unbounded: NO
Next by Date:
my votes on 33, 34, 35
Previous by thread:
Re: Motion M0033.01 -- Number format: YES
Next by thread:
Motion M0033.01 -- Number format: YES
Index(es):
Date
Thread