Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0036.03: YES

To: epopova@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0036.03: YES
From: Alexandru Amaricai <amaricai@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:13:37 +0300
Cc: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <503CE53E.5235.16416B1@epopova.bio.bas.bg>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <503CE53E.5235.16416B1@epopova.bio.bas.bg>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20

I also vote YES, with the same reasons.

Alexandru Amaricai

On 8/28/2012 6:35 PM, Evgenija D. Popova wrote:

My vote on Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors is YES.

I would like that we have an interval standard which enables rather
than precludes further refinements and extensions.

Evgenija Popova

--
Institute of Mathematics and Informatics
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

References:
- Motion P1788/M0036.03: YES
  - From: Evgenija D. Popova

Prev by Date: P1788 draft chapter "Introduction" with flavors
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0036.03: YES
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0036.03: YES
Next by thread: Motion 36.03: Flavors No
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread