Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Motion 36.03: Flavors No



My vote on motion 36.03 is No.

I would vote Yes if the number of flavours and the time for presenting a flavour would be limited.

 

Rationale:

What the scientific computing community primarily expects from P1788 is a standard on set based intervals, i.e., on closed (bounded and unbounded) real intervals of IR and \overline{IR}. I appreciate the goal keeping the standard open for possible extensions. But there is no need keeping it open for all kinds of (exotic) extensions.

 

Flavours on unbounded intervals, on wrap around intervals, or on cset intervals would seriously devaluate the set based part of the standard on which agreement is already available.

 

The only sensible extension many P1788 members see is Kaucher/modal arithmetic. If their proponents do not present a simple and acceptable motion until the end of this year IEEE P1788 should be finished without it immediately.


Ulrich Kulisch


-- 
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Institut für Angewandte und Numerische Mathematik
D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
Prof. Ulrich Kulisch

Telefon: +49 721 608-42680
Fax: +49 721 608-46679
E-Mail: ulrich.kulisch@xxxxxxx
www.kit.edu
www.math.kit.edu/ianm2/~kulisch/

KIT - Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg 
und nationales Großforschungszentrum in der 
Helmholtz-Gesellschaft