Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
My vote on
motion 36.03 is No. I would
vote Yes if the number of flavours and the time for presenting a
flavour would be
limited. Rationale: What the
scientific computing community primarily expects from P1788 is a
standard on
set based intervals, i.e., on closed (bounded and unbounded)
real intervals of
IR and \overline{IR}. I appreciate the goal keeping the standard
open for
possible extensions. But there is no need keeping it open for
all kinds of
(exotic) extensions. Flavours on
unbounded intervals, on wrap around intervals, or on cset
intervals would
seriously devaluate the set based part of the standard on which
agreement is
already available. The only
sensible extension many P1788 members see is Kaucher/modal
arithmetic. If their
proponents do not present a simple and acceptable motion until
the end of this
year IEEE P1788 should be finished without it immediately.
-- Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Institut für Angewandte und Numerische Mathematik D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany Prof. Ulrich Kulisch Telefon: +49 721 608-42680 Fax: +49 721 608-46679 E-Mail: ulrich.kulisch@xxxxxxx www.kit.edu www.math.kit.edu/ianm2/~kulisch/ KIT - Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Großforschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gesellschaft |