Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors Yes

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors Yes
From: Jose antonio Muñoz lopez <naramuno@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:48:23 +0200
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

My vote on Motion 36 is YES.

I agree with Corliss, George. Opening the standard other extentions
make it more rich and workable.

José A. Muñoz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors Yes
  - From: William Edmonson

Prev by Date: Re: Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors Yes
Next by Date: Re: I vote NO on motion 36.03...
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors
Next by thread: Re: Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors Yes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread