Re: a draft motion on midpoint and radius

[Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

With motion 32 failing, I suppose it's not relevant to whether or not
Motion 37 passes, that is, we wouldn't have an inconsistent set of
guidance if Motion 37 passes.  However, perhaps we should all understand the differences
between the two motions.

Baker

On 09/28/2012 10:49 AM, Nate Hayes wrote:
> IMO Motion 32 also gave a Level 1 definition that contradicted the Level 2 definition.
> Nate
> *From:* Michel Hack <mailto:mhack@xxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2012 10:14 AM
> *To:* stds-1788 <mailto:stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* a draft motion on midpoint and radius
> How is this different from Motion 32, which failed?
>
> Michel.
> ---Sent: 2012-09-28 15:16:06 UTC