Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: a draft motion on midpoint and radius

Quoting George Corliss, "It seems we are in violent agreement."

Baker

On 09/28/2012 11:48 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

On 2012-09-28 11:06:50 -0500, Nate Hayes wrote:

I agree. Personally I think the Level 2 definitions are good and it would be
nice to find some way to provide at Level 1 a consistent definition. How to
do this would be the question in my mind. Dan’s motion was a valiant effort.
Nate


I think that Level 1 should define the midpoint on non-empty, bounded
intervals only, and leave the remaining cases entirely to Level 2.