Re: P1788 1.8 "Language considerations"
On 2012-12-07 15:03:33 +0000, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
> On Dec 7 2012, Michel Hack wrote:
> >Nick Maclaren wrote:
> >>On Dec 7 2012, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >>
> >>>I think this should be more general to include constructors,
> >>
> >>for example, the concept of constructors occurs in only a few languages.
> >
> >I think Vincent was referring to P1788's constructors of intervals.
Yes.
> Ah. In which case, the previous paragraph was intended to include them.
> The first word "operations" could be chaged - but to what should it be
> changed?
It seems that my remark was due to the fact that I don't really
understand the second paragraph (at least in which context it
applies, compared to the first one).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)