Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Discussion period for motions 40, 41, and 42 extended

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Discussion period for motions 40, 41, and 42 extended
From: Michel Hack <mhack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:02:29 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <50E49B31.5010907@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <50D9951A.4040504@lusfiber.net> <50E49B31.5010907@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

>  I have updated the webpage.

I just checked -- and it still shows the Nov 30 version of Clauses 1&2,
and not the corrected Dec 17 version (both watermarked as version 6.1).
Shouldn't Motions 40 and 41 use the latest text?

The file for Motion 42 is up-to-date (Dec 31).

Michel.
---Sent: 2013-01-02 21:05:52 UTC

References:
- Discussion period for motions 40, 41, and 42 extended
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Re: Discussion period for motions 40, 41, and 42 extended
  - From: Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg

Prev by Date: RE: Motion 42 (not 41): Decoration system, revised text
Next by Date: Re: Discussion period for motions 40, 41, and 42 extended
Previous by thread: Re: Discussion period for motions 40, 41, and 42 extended
Next by thread: Noncontinuous examples
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread