Jürgen -- please clarify -- Re: compressed intervals
Jürgen (and P-1788 FYI),
I am a bit confused by your comment (appended). The only
mention of compressed intervals in any of the motions
presently under discussion (42) or under vote (40 and 41) is
in Motion 41, in the last paragraph of 2.5. Motion 41 is
under vote under the rules for actual standards text.
Your statement appears to apply to a larger part of the
document than the relevant parts of the motions presently
being processed. We can certainly take your comments
into account, and apply separate voting on compressed
intervals to the relevant individual parts of the document
as those parts come up for discussion and vote. However,
it cannot apply to Motion 41, since that motion is presently
under vote.
Thus, please clarify: Is your vote on Motion 41 "Yes" or
"No, but I'll vote 'Yes' if ..."?
Baker
On 01/12/2013 02:41 PM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
.
.
.
John
I urge you the delete everything on compressed interval arithmetc out of the
final version which we will vote on. Or even better make 2 parts out of the text with separate voting.
Otherwise I promise to vote "NO"
Juergen
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------