Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Guillaume's alternative definition(s) of "com"



What would be the decorated intermediate results for

( 1/(atan([\pi/4,\pi/2]) )^2 ?

Baker

On 02/18/2013 09:00 AM, John Pryce wrote:
Vincent

On 18 Feb 2013, at 10:07, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

On 2013-02-16 15:40:11 +0000, John Pryce wrote:
The dac, together with the bounded input(s), suffices to prove that
all the intermediate values, as well as the output, are
mathematically bounded, by compactness. (A continuous function on a
compact set is bounded.)

I think this was my reason for saying that com should describe what
actually happens at Level 2, rather than what ideally happens at
Level 1. Namely, I claim that your i2+o2 can never produce more
informative results than what such a compactness argument can
produce using i1+o1. And that there is no other good reason to move
to i2 and/or o2.

I agree. This is what I said in our private discussion in November:...

Thanks for circulating that. It's "obvious when you see it" but easy to forget why it's obvious. It needs spelling out in a Note to the main text somewhere.

John



--

---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott,   rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------