Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Help with interpretation of Motion 9

Baker,
   I fixed the webpage,
see you later
Jürgen
Am 29.03.2013 03:33, schrieb Ralph Baker Kearfott:

P-1788 participants:

While John and I have been reviewing the motions, we are having trouble
understanding exactly what was decided when Motion 9 was passed.
In particular, the motion itself appears to be empty, and
the position paper describes various things but does not
say precisely what things "shall" be included in the
standard.

Can someone please clarify or submit a clarifying motion?

Baker


--
-                Prof. Dr. Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg
     o           Lehrstuhl fuer Informatik II
    / \          Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg
InfoII o         Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602 Fax ../31 86603
  / \  Uni       E-Mail:wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 o   o Wuerzburg