Fwd: RE: Do I have a second? Re: Draft standard now available on web site --new Motion

[Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Do I have a second? Re: Draft standard now available on web site --new Motion
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:09:53 -0600
From: Kreinovich, Vladik <vladik@xxxxxxxx>
To: 'rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I can second

-----Original Message-----
From: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1788@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ralph Baker Kearfott
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 8:08 AM
To: J. Wolff von Gudenberg
Cc: Ralph Baker Kearfott; stds-1788; John Pryce
Subject: Do I have a second? Re: Draft standard now available on web site --new Motion

P-1788,

Do I have a second to this motion?

Note, however, the "typo."  The last sentence of Jürgen's email should be corrected to read:

    Then, as  it  is written in the "ENTIRE document", it shall be accepted as standard text.

Here, the "ENTIRE document" refers to the document in the fifth row of the table at

     http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/private/TheP1788Document/AllTextblocks.html

and this motion refers to section 9.6.8 of that document.  (Please contact me if you need a password to access the document.)

Best regards,

Baker

On 04/08/2013 11:25 PM, J. Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
> p1788
> Here is the first of the remaining motions on the text of level 1:
>
> The last sentence of § 9.6.8. Constructors shall be changed to
>
> Rules for the string t accepted at an implementation level are given
> in the Level 2 Subclause 11.11.1 on interval literals and may optionally be followed.
>
> Then, as  it  is written in the "ENTIRE document2 it shall be accepted
> as standard text, Jürgen
>
>
> Am 03.04.2013 23:33, schrieb Ralph Baker Kearfott:
> > P-1788:
> >
> > The entire draft standard is now available at:
> >
> > http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/private/TheP1788Document/AllTextb
> > locks.html
> >
> > (or go to http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/, click on "The P1788
> > document," then click on "The ENTIRE Document").
> >
> > We have already voted on parts of this document, and we will put up
> > explanations and additional chunks of this document for a vote in the
> > coming weeks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Baker
> >
> > P.S. Contact me if you need a password to the private area of the
> >       P-1788 site, where the document resides.