| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
On 04/24/2013 03:17 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I suggest using (-inf and +inf) to emphasize 1788 will be based on the realsOn 2013-04-23 22:32:07 -0700, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:Both original Jürgen's original definition and simplified definition clearly determine that divPair([1,1],Entire)=([-inf,0],[0,+inf]) Do you say that the result should be (Entire,Empty) ?The motion says several times that when two intervals are returned, they are disjoint, which is not the case of [-inf,0] and [0,+inf]. This is an inconsistency. Another point: though this is equivalent, Table 1 sometimes uses [-inf and +inf], and it sometimes uses (-inf and +inf).
and not the extended reals. (Just my 2 cents worth.) Baker -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax) (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home) URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street) Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------