Re: motioin43 amended
On 2013-04-24 07:12:48 -0500, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> On 04/24/2013 03:17 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >Another point: though this is equivalent, Table 1 sometimes uses
> >[-inf and +inf], and it sometimes uses (-inf and +inf).
> >
> I suggest using (-inf and +inf) to emphasize 1788 will be based on
> the reals and not the extended reals. (Just my 2 cents worth.)
However [-inf and +inf] emphasize the fact that the intervals are
closed.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)