RE: motioin43 amended
Not really, since (-inf, +inf) is clearly a closed set, I agree with Baker on this
-----Original Message-----
From: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1788@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vincent Lefevre
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 8:01 AM
To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: motioin43 amended
On 2013-04-24 07:12:48 -0500, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> On 04/24/2013 03:17 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >Another point: though this is equivalent, Table 1 sometimes uses
> >[-inf and +inf], and it sometimes uses (-inf and +inf).
> >
> I suggest using (-inf and +inf) to emphasize 1788 will be based on the
> reals and not the extended reals. (Just my 2 cents worth.)
However [-inf and +inf] emphasize the fact that the intervals are closed.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)