Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Bill, P-1788,Yes, thinking after I spoke, I see there shouldn't be a problem with I/O (conversion
of text strings).Also, because it is in Fortran, there is still a demand (small or not) for GlobSol --
so use of intervals certainly is not disjoint from use of Fortran. Best regards, Baker On 07/21/2013 07:49 PM, G. William (Bill) Walster wrote:
I know, Baker, but that is resolvable in a context-dependent way, at least it was, according to Robert Corbett.On 7/21/13 9:03 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:On 07/20/2013 10:37 AM, G. William (Bill) Walster wrote:All,Regarding I/O and literals, given that Fortran remains the language primarily devoted to numerically intense computing and clearly the language with the most elaborate and flexible I/O syntax and semantics, might it be worthwhile to consider its latest standard in addition to C and C++'s?Cheers, BillThat's a good point. However, here's a minor glitch: "[" and "]" are already in use in the current Fortran standard as delimiters. In particular, the delimiters for array constructors are listed as being either "(/" and "/)" or "[" and "]". This is defined intrinsically in the language. (I can't give a quote since I am not in possession of the current official standards document.) How might we get around that? Also, I'm not sure how many current interval experts (other than me) are using Fortran. Best regards, Baker
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax) (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home) URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street) Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------