Re: Motion P1788/M0049:EDP-Without-CA: discussion period begins

["Corliss, George" <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Baker,

By my records, this would be Motion 50.01.

Motion 49 is Juergen's M0049.01 Function Accuracy, which, as he has pointed out, is ready to move to a vote.

George


On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:50 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk5287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> P-1788,
> 
> Since this new motion has been made by Ulrich Kulisch and seconded by
> Lee Winter, the discussion period now  begins.
> 
> With consensus (unless there are objections), we will shorten the discussion period
> on this motion to one week, since discussion on very similar motions has
> already occurred.
> 
> IEEE P1788 requires an EDP. Providing it via CA is recommended. (For CA see the attachment).
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Baker
> 
> -- 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
> (337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
> URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
> Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
> (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
> Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> <DotProdP1788.pdf>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail