Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0049:EDP-Without-CA: discussion period begins



George, P-1788,

Thank you.  I stand corrected, and we'll proceed accordingly.

Best regards,

Baker

On 09/06/2013 07:09 AM, Corliss, George wrote:
Baker,

By my records, this would be Motion 50.01.

Motion 49 is Juergen's M0049.01 Function Accuracy, which, as he has pointed out, is ready to move to a vote.

George


On Sep 6, 2013, at 4:50 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk5287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

P-1788,

Since this new motion has been made by Ulrich Kulisch and seconded by
Lee Winter, the discussion period now  begins.

With consensus (unless there are objections), we will shorten the discussion period
on this motion to one week, since discussion on very similar motions has
already occurred.

IEEE P1788 requires an EDP. Providing it via CA is recommended. (For CA see the attachment).

Best regards,

Baker

--

---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------

<DotProdP1788.pdf>



--

---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott,   rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------