Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:54:14 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

My vote on motion 49 is YES.
John Pryce

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
  - From: Kreinovich, Vladik
- Re: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
  - From: Rudnei Dias da Cunha

Prev by Date: Motion 49:FunctionAccuracy yes
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
Next by thread: Re: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread