Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
RE: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
To
: John Pryce <
j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxx
>, "
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
" <
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: RE: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
From
: "Kreinovich, Vladik" <
vladik@xxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:48:59 +0000
Accept-language
: en-US
Cc
: "Kreinovich, Vladik" <
vladik@xxxxxxxx
>
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
A2FA9F83-D609-415B-99B4-15837D7745DE@cantab.net
>
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
References
: <
A2FA9F83-D609-415B-99B4-15837D7745DE@cantab.net
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Thread-index
: AQHOsF+J6dHJN6vVHUKjXpJ7PNOHfJnDv+sg
Thread-topic
: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
I vote YES on Motion 49
References
:
Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
From:
John Pryce
Prev by Date:
P1788: PLEASE VOTE on M0048 & 49
Next by Date:
Fwd: moton 49
Previous by thread:
Re: Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
Next by thread:
Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
Index(es):
Date
Thread