Re: Resend with correction Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: discussion period begins
Ulrich,
Of course, you can still respond during the voting period,
and Bill is welcome to change his vote during the voting
period, if he still desires.
Baker
On 09/16/2013 01:03 PM, Ulrich Kulisch wrote:
Am 16.09.2013 11:14, schrieb G. William (Bill) Walster:
I vote no on this motion because I have received no response to the
substance of my attached emails.
Best regards,
Bill
On 9/6/13 5:43 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
P-1788,
Since this new motion has been made by Ulrich Kulisch and seconded by
Lee Winter, the discussion period now begins.
With consensus (unless there are objections), we will shorten the
discussion period
on this motion to one week, since discussion on very similar motions has
already occurred.
IEEE P1788 requires an EDP. Providing it via CA is recommended. (For
CA see the attachment).
Best regards,
Baker
Bill I appologize for not yet having answered your mails. I still intend
to send you an answer. But there simply was no time left.
With best regards
Ulrich
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------