Re: Resend with correction Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: discussion period begins

["G. William (Bill) Walster" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Ulrich,

No apology necessary.

Of course, I will look forward to receiving your answer whenever you are 
able to send it.

However, I think it might be instructive for me and other voters to see 
to help us to make more informed votes.

Cheers,

Bill


On 9/16/13 11:03 AM, Ulrich Kulisch wrote:
> Am 16.09.2013 11:14, schrieb G. William (Bill) Walster:
> > I vote no on this motion because I have received no response to the
> > substance of my attached emails.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/6/13 5:43 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> > > P-1788,
> > >
> > > Since this new motion has been made by Ulrich Kulisch and seconded by
> > > Lee Winter, the discussion period now  begins.
> > >
> > > With consensus (unless there are objections), we will shorten the
> > > discussion period
> > > on this motion to one week, since discussion on very similar motions 
> > > has
> > > already occurred.
> > >
> > > IEEE P1788 requires an EDP. Providing it via CA is recommended. (For
> > > CA see the attachment).
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Baker
> Bill I appologize for not yet having answered your mails. I still 
> intend to send you an answer. But there simply was no time left.
>
> With best regards
> Ulrich