Re: Motion P1788/M0051:IntervalLiteralsText -- discussion period begins
On 2013-10-01 22:19:17 -0700, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:
> The portable interval literal syntax is defined for the Set-Based flavour.
> What do proponents of other flavours think about interval literals ?
> Interval literals in different flavours are not obliged to have the
> same syntax, but we can afford a small effort to make their styles
> similar (if this doesn't delay discussion).
I think that the same syntax should be accepted for common intervals
(same behavior on common intervals in all flavors). This is what
I proposed to John for the new clause (§9) he added at the end of
Chapter 1, on the functions required/recommended in all flavors.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)