Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Re: Motion 50: NO
To
: IEEEP1788a <
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: Motion 50: NO
From
: David Lester <
dlester@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:04:31 +0100
Cc
: David Lester <
dlester@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
524A88EE.8080908@uni-rostock.de
>
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
References
: <
524A88EE.8080908@uni-rostock.de
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
I vote No on motion 50, for the reasons already discussed by Vincent Lefevre. Dave Lester
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Motion 50: NO
From:
William Edmonson
References
:
Motion 50: NO
From:
Andreas Rauh
Prev by Date:
Re: Motion P1788/M0051:IntervalLiteralsText -- discussion period begins
Next by Date:
Re: Motion P1788/M0051:IntervalLiteralsText -- discussion period begins
Previous by thread:
Motion 50: NO
Next by thread:
Re: Motion 50: NO
Index(es):
Date
Thread