Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Another new Motion: Accept new §9: Ops reqd in all flavors

John et al,

Yes, that's the point of the discussion period --- to
adjust the motion prior to voting.  We shouldn't
adjust the motion during the vote, since it wouldn't
be honest to people who already voted.

Yes, I believe I can shorten the discussion period if
appropriate by beginning the voting "with consensus";
that is, the voting will proceed after my announcement
unless someone objects.

My formal posting concerning Motion 53 is soon to follow.

Best regards,


On 10/04/2013 06:30 AM, John Pryce wrote:

I submit this motion:


Chair: Is it OK that we vote to accept whatever text results at the end of the discussion period;
and that this period may be shortened, or up to a point lengthened, according to how active the discussion is?

John Pryce


Ralph Baker Kearfott,   rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA