| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
John, Yes. I trust your judgment on this. We don't want to "spin our wheels" but we also want the highest quality standard possible. Best regards, Baker On 11/06/2013 01:42 AM, John Pryce wrote:
Baker On 2013 Nov 5, at 16:04, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:Yes, minor changes shouldn't require formal voting. However, on the other hand, I would not recommend making minor wording changes at this point when both ways are grammatically correct...It seemed sensible to do the changes on George's list (except for Level 3 & Annexes, which are being worked on) while they were hot off the press. I won't do any more such minor (grammatical) edits before the sponsor ballot phase. If an edit seems essential it can't be minor, and needs to be discussed. Regards John
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax) (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home) URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street) Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------