Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Lee, On 2013-11-23, at 10:15 AM, Lee Winter <lee.j.i.winter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott > <rbk5287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> P-1788: >> > I further offer a friendly amendment to Bill motion. I want more than > the "level 1" math. We need the rigor applied to the transforms from > "level 1" to "level 2". Could you point out where rigor is lacking so we work on it? Regards, Ned