Re: Do I have a second? Re: Motion to stop work on the standard
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ned Nedialkov <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Lee,
>
> On 2013-11-23, at 10:15 AM, Lee Winter <lee.j.i.winter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott
>> <rbk5287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> P-1788:
>>>
>> I further offer a friendly amendment to Bill motion. I want more than
>> the "level 1" math. We need the rigor applied to the transforms from
>> "level 1" to "level 2".
>
> Could you point out where rigor is lacking so we work on it?
A sensible question. I will work on it. However, I am away from home
so do not expect to deliver anything until Monday at the earliest.
And I do not claim to know the complete inventory of weaknesses and
compromises that we have, so others should chime in if possible.
Duplicates such reports are not an issue AFAICT.
Later,
-- Lee