Re: ... replacement for 14.4 and C6.2 (interchange encodings)
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:43:46 +0100 John Pryce wrote:
> That's OK in British & also I believe in US English as a
> shortening of either the subjunctive
> > (2) The standard merely requires that the parameters <== that
> > of the octets-encoding be communicated
> or the infinitive
> > (3) The standard merely requires the parameters
> > of the octets-encoding to be communicated <== to be
> (both mean the same in this context).
From the snippet compress.pdf that Dima sent out I can't tell whether
this grammar issue has been resolved. Either (2) or (3) is fine, but
the original sentence lacked the "that" and had "be" instead of "to be".
Michel.
---Sent: 2014-06-27 19:53:21 UTC