Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: ... replacement for 14.4 and C6.2 (interchange encodings)

According to my sense, either is OK.

Baker

On 06/27/2014 02:46 PM, Michel Hack wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 22:43:46 +0100 John Pryce wrote:

That's OK in British & also I believe in US English as a
shortening of either the subjunctive

(2) The standard merely requires that the parameters    <== that
     of the octets-encoding be communicated

or the infinitive

(3) The standard merely requires the parameters
     of the octets-encoding to be communicated           <== to be

(both mean the same in this context).



From the snippet compress.pdf that Dima sent out I can't tell whether

this grammar issue has been resolved.  Either (2) or (3) is fine, but
the original sentence lacked the "that" and had "be" instead of "to be".

Michel.
---Sent: 2014-06-27 19:53:21 UTC




--

---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott,   rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------