P1788/D9.6 -- the recirculation ballot
I'm very happy about the shape of this document. I'm sorry not to have
participated more in the deliberations here in the last three months; I
followed them but had no significant disagreements, and the final result
of the new way of defining literals is a great success.
I have only two editorial comments, and since they were among my original
comments I see no point in repeating them officially, so I just let my
current approval stand. These two comments were:
(1) Some names in the participant list (page vi) don't match between
the special and general lists, or the participants' preferred
names which they have pointed out in this forum. And, given that
the font used supports diacritics (as in Günter), surely it could
handle Lefèvre too.
(2) The conformance statement (page 11) says "P1788" -- but surely
the "P" will go away when the standard is finally approved.
Michel.
---Sent: 2015-04-11 17:13:03 UTC