Re: P1788.1/M001.01
P1788 (or P1788.1 ?)
On 23 Sep 2015, at 16:19, Rudnei Dias da Cunha <rudnei.cunha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Vincent and colleagues,
>
> Em qua, 23 de set de 2015 às 11:32, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> On 2015-09-22 18:46:57 +0000, Rudnei Dias da Cunha wrote:
> > Seconding Michel's remarks, I'd add that then on line 11, Section 4.6.4
> > should mention the relationship 1 = true, 0 = false?
>
> I suppose that you mean that it should no longer mention this
> relationship.
>
> Yes, that's what I meant.
Can I suggest leaving the tables as they are, and on page 11 line 11 delete "(1 = true, 0 = false)" and append a sentence on the lines of
"In this document, the boolean values true and false are given numeric values 1 and 0 respectively, but a language may have a different mapping of booleans to numbers, or no such mapping."
John Pryce