Re: P1788.1/M002.01
On 2015-11-24 10:19:25 +0000, John Pryce wrote:
> I voted Yes, and I still land on that side, just. Oliver (I think)
> argued that if P1788.1 is a flavor of the full standard, that makes
> it *less* attractive in his eyes. For me, it makes it *more* so.
> However, I respect Ned's views that these are functions that are
> rarely used. I guess it is a matter of taste between "minimal
> useful" and "minimal subject to being a flavor".
If the difference between these two is small (as it seems to be the
case), then I prefer the latter.
If functions are so rarely used, one may wonder why the main standard
requires them (at least for any flavor).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)