Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788.1/M001.02: YES

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Motion P1788.1/M001.02: YES
From: "Ian McIntosh" <ianm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 20:56:36 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

I vote yes. Having different wording in P1788.1 and P1788 will cause confusion, and it's better to correct both at the same time.

- Ian McIntosh IBM Canada Lab Compiler Back End Support and Development

Prev by Date: Re: P1788.1/M001.02: withdrawal (was: voting period begins (on Nov 30 and ends on Dec 21))
Next by Date: Re: "natural interval extension"
Previous by thread: Re: Motion P1788.1/M001.02: No
Next by thread: Motion P1788.1/M001.02 NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread