RE: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
I agree, it is an excellent idea
-----Original Message-----
From: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1788@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Pryce
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 1:35 AM
To: Ned Nedialkov <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stds-1788 <STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
All
I like this and will vote YES for itr when voting starts.
John Pryce
On 20 Dec 2015, at 16:29, Nedialkov, Ned <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would like to propose a friendly amendment to the existing motion
> M001.02:
> replace "natural interval extension" with "tightest interval extension".