Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- To: Richard Fateman <fateman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ulrich Kulisch <ulrich.kulisch@xxxxxxx>, Oliver Heimlich <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- From: Ralph Baker Kearfott <rbk5287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:26:00 -0600
- Cc: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Götz Alefeld <Goetz.Alefeld@xxxxxxx>, Gerd Bohlender <bohlender@xxxxxxx>, Van Snyder <Van.Snyder@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <56A5127C.3070702@berkeley.edu>
- List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
- List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
- References: <201512072133.tB7LXrjP011061@d03av01.boulder.ibm.com> <566607C8.1020407@univ-nantes.fr> <56668506.32241.10C28942@smarkov.bio.bas.bg> <4d2ae23cbed566d42cf8e44e71269281@imap.univ-nantes.prive> <4AC1D68D-9FC5-4C33-ADA2-0A6C5A8E2947@cardiff.ac.uk> <56671509.3030401@kit.edu> <1449601371409.50567@utep.edu> <56673681.3070309@louisiana.edu> <D874978F-A3AB-4199-806D-219C44D9553F@mcmaster.ca> <BAA7EE2F-49B4-4783-BBA7-1FB0D241AD4F@ens-lyon.fr> <5697C339.6060308@kit.edu> <5697CAC8.3070103@berkeley.edu> <569A2573.1060506@kit.edu> <569A6F2A.3030707@berkeley.edu> <569D25D7.1090108@kit.edu> <569D713B.5020102@berkeley.edu> <56A140D7.7070505@kit.edu> <56A14C4F.8080908@berkeley.edu> <56A24ED6.1080704@kit.edu> <56A42D06.1040605@heimlich-online.net> <56A4BAB1.5050906@kit.edu> <56A5127C.3070702@berkeley.edu>
- Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
HMMM. What about memory access bandwidth and speed, and
its impact on the overall speeds of
single versus double precision?
Baker
On 01/24/2016 12:05 PM, Richard Fateman wrote:
The (re) submission of these letters to the discussion
raised a question in my mind.
I am puzzled by the WG 2.5 vote urging the IEEE 754 committee to
incorporate two facilities.
* [double precision interval arithmetic] *_at the speed of _*simple
floating-point arithmetic.
* provide___*high-speed*_ arithmetic [for dynamic precision intervals]
What puzzles me is the statement of speed requirements in a standard of
this nature.
Was WG 2.5 thinking that the IEEE committee was derelict in its duties
in allowing
some or all of the 754 arithmetic operations to be provided in slow speed?
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- Motion P1788.1/M001.02 -- YES
- Re: Motion P1788.1/M001.02 -- YES
- Re: Motion P1788.1/M001.02 -- YES
- Re: Motion P1788.1/M001.02 -- YES
- Re: "natural interval extension"
- Re: "natural interval extension"
- From: Neher, Markus (IANM) [IANM bezeichnet die Organisationseinheit Institut für Angewandte und Numerische Mathematik]
- Re: "natural interval extension"
- Re: "natural interval extension"
- From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02
- Re: discussion period begins, until Jan. 26: "natural interval extension": friendly amendment to M001.02