Hi Steve,
I prefer the Alternative notation.
Thanks and regards,
Dong
From: Steve Shellhammer <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2022 4:44 PM
To: Dong Wei <dong.wei@xxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EXT] RE: Updated PDT
Caution:
EXT Email
Dong, et. al.,
Based on your comment I would like to ask you and others which of the following two notations do you prefer for Table B. Here is the Current Notation for a
few rows and an Alternative notation for those rows.
What is people’s preference?
Regards,
Steve
------------------------
Current Notation for Table B
|
Field |
Size (bits) |
Meaning |
|
Scaling Factor ( |
12 |
Scaling Factor for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 1 |
|
Scaling Factor ( |
12 |
Scaling Factor for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Scaling Factor ( |
12 |
Scaling Factor for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna
|
|
|
|
|
|
CSI ( |
|
CSI for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 1 |
|
CSI ( |
|
CSI for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 2 |
|
|
|
|
Alternative Notation for Table B
|
Field |
Size (bits) |
Meaning |
|
|
12 |
Scaling Factor for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 1 |
|
|
12 |
Scaling Factor for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
Scaling Factor for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CSI for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 1 |
|
|
|
CSI for Transmit Antenna 1 and Receive Antenna 2 |
|
|
|
|
From: Steve Shellhammer
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:42 PM
To: Dong Wei <dong.wei@xxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EXT] RE: Updated PDT
Dong,
That is an interesting suggestion. If we did that maybe, we would do the same with the CSI. We can then use the notation from the equations.
If we did it that way we would make the following changes,
- Change “Scaling Factor(TX = 1, RX = 3)” to “
” - Similarly for the CSI we would change “CSI(TX=1, RX=3)” to “
”
Do people prefer this notation for that table?
Regards,
Steve
From: Dong Wei <dong.wei@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:34 PM
To: Steve Shellhammer <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [EXT] RE: Updated PDT
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hi Steve,
I have a comment on Table B. For example, in the fifth row and first column,
,
“RX” is used as a variable/index and as an abbreviation for receiver simultaneously. I would like to suggest that
Scaling Factor (
)
be replaced with Scaling Factor (
)
or 
,
and similar replacement for all entries in the first column.
Thanks,
Dong
From:
stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Steve Shellhammer
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 4:48 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXT] RE: Updated PDT
Caution:
EXT Email
Junghoon, Zinan, and Rui, et. al.,
Thanks Zinan and Junghoon.
I first accepted the changes we have been making to the document and posted that as R3.
I then made the following changes,
- Generated a draft R4 document
- Added Zinan as a co-author
- Made the changes suggested by Zinan (using Track changes)
- Edited Equation (A)
- Edited the sentence after Equation (A) to fit with the edits to the equation
- Added a sentence in b) describing how
may be used in the selection of the scaling factor 
,
which I hope addresses the comment that Rui made.
Hopefully, these address the comment from the call this morning. If this looks good, I can post this as R4. Or if other edits are needed, I can make
those changes and post the edited version as R4.
Regards,
Steve
From: Junghoon Suh <000017d35818e7c0-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 10:11 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] Updated PDT
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hi, Zinan
I am ok with this version as well. It is more clearly described.
I just wanted to mean two bits are not necessary to indicate the I_ng parameter, unless we want to keep one more bits for the forward compatibility like for the
next generation Sensing.
Regards
Junghoon
From: Zinan Lin [mailto:000019c80da359b9-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: July 26, 2022 12:24 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] Updated PDT
Hi Steve,
Thank you very much for presenting 11-22/1020r2.
Attached please find my suggestions on Table A, which also incorporates Junghoon’s suggestion to put NOTE in the column of Ing meaning.
Please take a look at the document.
Best,
Zinan
From: stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Behalf Of Steve Shellhammer
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2022 12:01 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Updated PDT
|
Hi Tony, With help from a number of people I have updated the following PDT and would like to review it on the Task Group call. 11-22/1020r2 “PDT Formatting of CSI”,
Steve Shellhammer (20 minutes) Regards,Steve To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the |
|
|
Hi Tony,
With help from a number of people I have updated the following PDT and would like to review it on the Task Group call.
11-22/1020r2 “PDT Formatting of CSI”, Steve Shellhammer (20 minutes)
Regards,
Steve
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1