[STDS-802-11-TGBN] 答复: Regarding 25/0018r1 (Considerations on STAs without NPCA Capability)

[Liyunbo <00001846a2e5e0c1-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Juseong,

 

Thanks for setup this email thread. I generally fine with this direction, but with below comments.

 

1)       The word “shall” is too strong, it disallow other potential implementation choice. Change “shall” to “should” is better.

2)       The UHR non-AP STA that disable NPCA should also be included in the SP.

 

Regards,

Yunbo

 

发件人: "문주성 (Juseong Moon)" [mailto:theonebird81@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2025年8月21日 22:38
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
抄送: Gaurang Naik <gnaik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Shizhenpeng <shizhenpeng1@xxxxxxxxxx>; mhasabelnaby92@xxxxxxxxx; ac.vrns@xxxxxxxxx; sh.byeon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>; serkucuk@xxxxxxxxxx; mhasabelnaby92@xxxxxxxxx; Shizhenpeng <shizhenpeng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
主题: Regarding 25/0018r1 (Considerations on STAs without NPCA Capability)

 

Hi all,

This is Juseong Moon from KNUT.

 

Today, I presented the submission 25/0018r1, regarding TXOP truncation problem of NPCA operation, in the TGbn MAC conference call (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-0018-01-00bn-considerations-on-stas-without-npca-capability.pptx).

I would like to continue the discussion on the submission.

If you have any questions or opinions on this submission, please let me know.

 

Thank you.

 

Juseong Moon.

 

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1