I should have been clearer. "REVISED -- This was fixed already in
D1.1" would
also not be a suitable resolution. The commenter or anyone else reviewing
a proposed resolution should be able to determine what was done to address
the comment just by looking at the resolution.
>
From Ross: Could be Accepted or Revised with instructions, and have a note to the editor: saying has been resolved in D1.x, no further changes are
needed.
This.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Yujian (Ross Yu) <00001792b51ef4ea-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, 17 October 2025 01:20
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Announcement: P802.11bn D1.1 is now available
Hi Alfred, Mark and all,
Thanks Mark for the reminder, which I totally agree.
I paste the tutorial and guideline links here:
- Comment and resolution tutorial and guideline:
- https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0230-05-0000-comment-resolution-tutorial.ppt,
Dorothy Stanley (HP Enterprise)
- IEEE SA Balloting and Comment Resolution Process Guidelines (https://standards.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/import/governance/revcom/guidelines.pdf
- https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/13/11-13-0230-05-0000-comment-resolution-tutorial.ppt,
Dorothy Stanley (HP Enterprise)
The part Mark quoted in the tutorial slides:
- Rejected
means “we disagree with the comment, and made no changes”. Don’t use “Rejected” if the comment is addressed in another comment. Instead, repeat part of the resolution of that comment as appropriate. Don’t use “Rejected - Fixed in Draft x.y” as a resolution
because it doesn’t say what you changed to resolve the comment.
From Ross: Could be Accepted or Revised with instructions, and have a note to the editor: saying has been resolved in D1.x, no further
changes are needed.
Example on Revised resolution in the tutorial slides (we discussed this during Po-Kai’s contribution):
- “Revised.
- At p 1234 line 56 change “shall” to “should”.
- In reply to the commenter, this allows legacy STAs to continue this behaviour, but allows new STAs to choose what
to do.
regards
于健 Ross Jian Yu
Huawei Technologies
发件人:
Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
发送时间:
2025年10月17日
2:36
收件人:
STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题:
Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Announcement: P802.11bn D1.1 is now available
Comments are on TGbn D1.0 so that would be an incorrect resolution.
Regards,
Alfred
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025, 11:23 AM
Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Please make sure that all CRDs that are in preparation use D1.1 as a baseline, as it will simplify our editor's work and avoid any conflicts between different variants of the draft.
… but the resolutions have to be against D1.0. So no "REJECT -- This was fixed already in D1.1" etc.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français
Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600
1 Cambridge Square, Cambridge CB4 0AE Fax: +44 1223 434601
ROYAUME UNI WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk
From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 16 October 2025 19:18
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Announcement: P802.11bn D1.1 is now available
Hello All,
P802.11bn D1.1 is now available in the members area:
Thanks to our editor, Ross, for working around the clock to ensure the delivery of the draft in a timely manner.
Reminder for all PDT/CR authors: Please make sure that all CRDs that are in preparation use D1.1 as a baseline, as it will simplify our editor's work and avoid any conflicts between different variants of the draft.
Regards,
Alfred
--
Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1